Engaging with Science Part 2

Engaging with Science Part 2
Rapport Issue


Publication Date

February 28th 2013


Andy Coote

In the first part of this debate, Andy Coote talked to Suzanne Henwood, Andy Smith and Joe Cheal about the vulnerability of NLP to scientific research aimed at undermining the premises upon which it is based. In that discussion, we reached a consensus that the NLP community could (and should) engage with the scientific community much more. In this article we explore how that might be achieved....

Provoking Debate

To access the rest of this article, you need to use 1 credit

ANLP members get complimentary credits that can be used for purchasing from the Rapport archive - a collection of more than a 1000 high quality articles written by some of the leading voices in the field of NLP. Non-members can buy Rapport credits via the ANLP store.

If you have already purchased this article, you can log in to access it